Cyber Exchange Final Report
1998-99
Contents


History and Content
Procedures
Project Goals and Evaluation Results
Conclusions
Future of Cyber Exchange Project

 
 

History and Content




During the 1998-99 school year the Cyber Exchange for Educators project was implemented, funded, in part, by a Goals 2000 grant. 

Through the Cyber Exchange project, 32 classroom teachers in grade levels 1-5 teachers received monthly instruction by the county technology trainer at the technology training center in the use of technology to deliver curriculum.  The training was scheduled as grade level sessions in which the teachers planed and organized scheduling of large and small group computer related activities, and developed lesson plans for specific implementation of those technologies.  Through this project, teachers used the technology as a tool to aid the students in mastery of specific reading skills.  Follow up was conducted through monthly journal entries. 

Teachers participating in the project had access to reading skill development software, which was checked out on a monthly basis.  Participating classes will also utilize the Accelerated Reading program that was on the school’s file server. 

Each participating school received a laptop computer and video cams.  The laptop computer was loaned to Cyber Exchange teachers within that school who did not have access to a computer at home.  A total of 84% of the Cyber Exchange teachers utilized the laptop. 

The Cyber Exchange web site and a monthly online newsletter, Tech Update, provided teachers an opportunity to read about each other’s lesson plans, software uses, learning activities, and successes in the teaching of specific objectives through the integration of technology.  The Cyber Exchange for Educators web site is located at http://207.125.93.3/ce/ and http://207.125.93.3/techupdate/ is the URL for the Tech Update newsletter. 

The project incorporated the involvement of Cyber Ambassadors, student mentors, from grades 4-5 within each school.  These ambassadors attended summer training sessions and during the school year regularly visited participating classrooms, assisting the classroom teacher and their students in their efforts to integrate hardware and software.  This was the least effective aspect of the project with only 76% of the participating teachers utilizing the Cyber Ambassadors.  One reason for this low number were scheduling conflicts with the Cyber Ambassador’s teachers.  The lack of usage was particularly noted in the larger schools where the fifth grade classrooms distance was so far away from that of the lower grades it made it difficult to schedule visits. 

A valuable aspect of the project was the sharing of implementation of the previous month’s skills and problems or successes experienced through jounaling.  These journals are stored at the web site (http://207.125.93.3/ce/journals.htm) and can prove to be a useful resource to teachers who are beginning to implement technology into their curriculum. 
Contents

Procedures

The Cyber Exchange project timetable of objectives followed included: 
May 1998  Identified 32 teachers (25 former 21st Century Classroom teachers plus 7 new teachers representing each elementary school) and the Cyber Ambassadors (15 fourth and fifth grade students representing each elementary school).  Project goals, objectives, and timeline were discussed. 

June 1998  June 23-26, 1999 trained student mentors or Cyber Ambassadors to assist teachers participating in the project and record anticipated and reflective descriptive evaluation journal entries. 

August  1998 Held a workshop on Aug. 4-5, 1998  for the 7 participating teachers receiving a new computer in the use of hardware and Windows 95. 

September  1998  Participants developed lesson plans which integrated the use of MS Word in the mastery of curriculum objects.  These lesson plans are stored at the Cyber Exchange web sites (http://207.126.93.3/ce/lessonplans.htm). 

October 1998 Trained participants in the use of Internet projects, which mastered specific objectives.  The projects are listed and linked at the web site (http://207.125.93.3/ce/projects.htm). 

Of the teachers in the project 97% successfully participated in their chosen Internet project.  Two teachers were unable to complete their project, one due to medical leave from the classroom.  The other participant who didn’t complete their Internet project, a first year teacher, did not follow through on the project. 

November 1998 Participants developed and saved a set of Internet web site bookmarks useful in the mastery of objectives.  Participants also created a set of Literary Links of favorite children’s authors to use with the reading program (http://207.125.93.3/ce/literaylinks.htm). 

December 1998 Participants used email to master specific objectives and developed an address book, which was used as a contact resource. 

January 1999 Teachers were trained in the use of the ICQ chats for Internet projects and developed a lesson plan utilizing ICQ to teach a reading or language arts objective.  These lesson plans are stored at the web site (http://207.126.93.3/ce/lessonplans.htm). 

February 1999 97% of the project’s participants created interactive PowerPoint Presentations designed to teach a language arts/reading objective.  These presentations are stored at the web site as zipped files and can be downloaded there (http://207.125.93.3/ce/ppt.htm).  In addition to teacher presentations there are also Cyber Ambassador presentations.  Participating teachers were given a CD copy of these presentations (see enclosed CD). 

March 1999 Participants developed classroom web sites to provide a space to post student work and provide information for parents.  The classroom web sites have links to a section called “All About Me,” a biographical section created by students and their classroom newspapers.  Of the participating teachers 91% created classroom web sites.  Terra Nova tests were administered to students for use in a comparison of gains in the area of reading and language arts (http://207.125.93.3/ce/websites.html). 

April 1999 Teachers were trained to upload their classroom newspapers to their web site.  Teacher also were trained in the use of the video cam for videoconferencing and instructed in the use of the SmallWorld telecommunication project (http://user.icx.net/~campbelld/small_world/). 

May 1999 Participants were asked to complete an evaluation of the project.  Several participating teachers presented the project at the Summer Institute in Oak Ridge, TN.  The project has also been submitted as a presentation at the fall TETA in Nashville, Tennessee. 

Cyber Exchange Teachers presenting at Summer Institute, July 23, 1999, Oak Ridge
Contents
 
 

Project Goals and Evaluation Results

The National Goals this project addresses are

  • Improved student achievement through the use of technology as a tool to enhance the reading curriculum. 
Benchmark:  Previously Jefferson County provided one yearly workshop for teachers to develop ideas to integrate technology into the curriculum. 
Evaluation Results:   Teachers recorded in journals their uses of technology and supplied lesson plans and activities which were posted on the Cyber Exchange web site (http://207.125.93.3/ce/). 
  • Teacher education and professional development. 
Benchmark:  Previously the only professional development provided for teachers were 2 hour after- school mini workshops. There was little opportunity for follow up visits to classrooms and no opportunity to address the issue of integration of technology into the curriculum. 
Evaluation Results:  Record of participant monthly attendance were kept by technology trainer and submitted to technology coordinator to determine teacher commitment to the project.  The attendance record results are as follows: 
The Tennessee Master Plan Goals this project addresses are:
  • State of the art technology will be used to improve curriculum.
Benchmark: Grade level 1-5 students in Jefferson County currently have had access to technology tools to achieve world class standards through the 21st century program.  Since this program is no longer funded by the state, Jefferson County has picked up the tab, so strong is the county’s commitment to providing their students with the best technology tools.  Due to funding restraints, one computer was placed in 16 classrooms during the 1998-99 school year.  Through the Cyber Exchange, 7 additional computers were placed in grade level 1-5 classrooms. 
Evaluation Results: Monthly teacher journal entries were prompted by questions that focused on the use of technology in the classroom.  The technology coordinator used these entries to determine the effectiveness of the software for future software purchases and educational technology needs.  As a result of this evaluation the technology coordinator will fund a similar project for the 1999-2000 school year aimed at integrating technology in math and science focusing on grade levels 5-8. 

Tennessee Report Card Performance Indicators
Competency (Reading) 
Benchmark: Jefferson County School System’s TCAP reading scores have shown a drop from the National Norm gain during the past years.  The scores are as follows: 

1994-95 95.0% 
1995-96 90.3% 
1996-97 89.5% 
Evaluation Results: Comparison of gains from of a random sampling of reading and language arts Terra Nova scores of a target group of 100 students to a control group of 100 students was prepared.  This comparison was based on the 1997-98, and 1998-99 school year Terra Nova scores.  After removing student transfers and students who did not take the Terra Nova test both years, 94 students were in the control group and 98 students were in the target group. 

The target group showed a gain of 18.897 scaled score points to a gain of 7.680 scaled score points for the control group on the Language Composite of the Terra Nova test from the 1998 test to the 1999 test. 




The same target group showed a gain of 11.948 scaled score points to a gain of 10.316 scaled score points for the control group on the Language Composite of the Terra Nova test from the 1998 test to the 1999 test. 

The Jefferson County System Technology Plan Goals this project addresses are:

  • The teacher will explore and identify learning and teaching styles that enhance the environment of learning for all students.
Benchmark:  Most teachers in Jefferson County Elementary Schools addressed the state curriculum objectives using traditional textbook, workbook, or paper-pencil methods.  The Cyber Exchange utilized productivity software allowing the learner to become involved with instruction 
Evaluation Results:  Monthly journal entries by the Cyber Exchange teachers were recorded and are stored at the Cyber Exchange web site.  The results of these entries provide the following insight into participating teachers usage of technology to enhance learning.  A complete summary of the effects of utilizing technology to enhance learning can be see in the Effects of project.xls worksheet and graphs. 


 

  • Teachers will stay abreast of the current and innovative uses of technology.
Benchmark: Several teachers in Jefferson County have attended after-school workshops to learn the basics of using technology during the school year thus far.  Before this project was implemented there has been very little attention paid to the integration of technology. 
Evaluation:  Formal written evaluation by participating teachers at the end of each monthly teacher training session was utilized by the technology trainer to assess and adjust monthly training sessions.  A final journal entry provided participating teachers an opportunity to assess the project and it’s effectiveness (http://207.125.93.3/ce/ select journal link). 
 
  • Teachers and administrators will be provided with necessary network equipment capability, which will allow them to meet student needs.
Benchmark: There was an average of 4 classrooms and a central library in grades 1-5 with network capability in Jefferson County Schools 
Evaluation Results:  .  Through this project 7 classrooms were provided computers and connected to the existing network which increased access for over 140 students.  In addition, the project provided the 32 participating teachers with the skills to utilize network capability for over 700 students.  Three additional computers were also purchased to help update 3 classrooms which had older computers that were becoming obsolete. 
Contents
 
 

Conclusions

When viewing Language Composite and Reading Composite scores for a randomly selected group of students who participated in the project (target group) the scores for the 1999 Terra Nova test appear slightly higher than those of the same students on the 1998 tests.  This would indicate an improvement in student achievement through the use of technology.  However, when a comparison of these same scores is made to students who were not involved in the project (control group) the same slight improvement in the 1999 scores is seen over the 1998 scores. The project only showed a slight improvement in the target student group’s achievement through the use of technology over the control group’s scores. 

The Target Group made a gain of 18.89795018 in the Language Composite scale score from the 1998 Terra Nova Test to the 1999 test.  The Control Group made a gain of 7.680851064 in the Language Composite scale score from the 1998 Terra Nova Test to the 1999 test.  The difference between the Target Group and Control Group’s gain in the Language Composite between the 1998 and 1999 test is 11.217099116 scaled score points. 

The Reading Composite gain is much less dramatic.  The Target Group made a gain of 11.94897959 scale score points from the 1998 to the 1999 Terra Nova test on the Reading Composite score.  The Control group made a gain of 10.319414894 on the same test.  The difference in the Reading Composite gain is only that of  1.62983065.  The gain on the Reading Composite score is only barely significant. 

One major advancement through the project was that of staff development.  Teachers indicated that 86% of them had changed their teaching style as a result of the monthly training sessions.  These sessions provided them an opportunity to stay abreast of current and innovative uses of technology and explore and identify learning and teaching styles that enhance instruction. 
Contents
 


Future of Cyber Exchange Project

The Cyber Exchange web site will remain to enable educators everywhere to participate and share innovative methods of using technology to teach objectives.  Teachers throughout the United States are utilizing the web site and corresponding with teachers in the project. 
Some samples of these email responses were included in the July Report.  In addition there have been requests from other school systems for more information on the project and some have shown an interest in duplicating it in their school system. 

Participating teachers will provide in-service training in the fall of 1999 for their staff who will have access to much of the technology described in the project through the use of a computer teacher station, which has been placed in every school library. 

During the 1999-2000 the project will continue focusing on the area of math and science in grades 5-12 involving 20 educators through local funding.  Their efforts and work will be added to the Cyber Exchange web site, which will continue to grow as a resource for educators. 

Contents


 

Cyber Exchange
for Educators

Cyber Ambassadors

Lesson Plans

PowerPoint Presentations

Links
1998-99 Schedule
1999-2000 Schedule
 
 

Need Help?

Webmaster:  Connie Campbell